I left abandoned (for now) the series of Seville which I two tickets to complete this of evolution. When finished with this return with the other.
We said yesterday ... (Yes, yesterday!)
That the Earth is full of living beings. He also said that complex things like an eye of a fly or a human brain, or an earthworm have a negligible probability of being by random combination. And even less, all three at once, combined with the millions and millions of different living things we know to have existed or exist. If this were the result of chance, it would be possible (in a time soooo big, it's likely to happen, at least as an exception), things would be very different: the living would not seem like hell with each other. And there would be no evidence indicating increasing complexity (as is the case). And given the number and diversity (within similar) life would be logical to think that chance will also create new and complex beings from time to time. And that, folks, like everything in life, may also be possible, as could be possible that in the Euromillions touch for 100 weeks at the same 5 antics, but I tell you that the second week shut down the kiosk with a fuck scandal.
Total, which if this life is not a matter of chance, there is "something" that orders and makes the order of complexity gradually increase (the human brain is the most complex object ever observed in the Universe). Given this something we have had a historic choice of explanation, that is called God. With God I do not mean the Judeo-Christian God or the Roman gods or any other, but an abstract figure serves as an explanation of the complexity of living beings.
However, the concept of a God creator of life more complex inserted in the system than trying to solve: in fact the only thing we do is shift the problem of complexity, not solving it.
What we say is that there be (or whatever) enough complex to be able to design / create the complexity developed by all living organisms detected and studied until now. This must necessarily be to be able to create an eye, should be a lot more complex than an eye, to create a cell of wheat, should be a lot more complex than a cell of wheat, etc ... And we have the problem, but increased by several orders of magnitude: as we explain now the complexity of God?
Well, now we know that if this complexity is here or not because of fate, or God, and yet it is ubiquitous. Humanity was a little lost on this issue until a man named Charles Darwin public on November 24 , 1859 " On the Origin of Species " We welcome the day with a startling assertion: the complexity (the living) has evolved over time from a single common ancestor for it using natural selection. Booooooooooooommmmmmmmmm!! ( this is the sound of the explosion he had to make a head when in the nineteenth century learned about this idea as very transgressive)
For the next login, you see that the implications of living beings we come from a common ancestor, and that's that natural selection, and return back to the subject of the chance to discover the first living being.
continue ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment